Climbing Vine Stuff!

Climbing Vine Stuff! Climbing Vine Stuff! Climbing Vine Stuff!
  • Home
  • Website
  • About
  • TLO News Sept. 2026.
  • TLO News Oct. 2026
  • Preview Nov. 2026 News
  • Contact
  • News Essays, Commentary.
  • Book Reviews.
  • Logout
  • More
    • Home
    • Website
    • About
    • TLO News Sept. 2026.
    • TLO News Oct. 2026
    • Preview Nov. 2026 News
    • Contact
    • News Essays, Commentary.
    • Book Reviews.
    • Logout

Climbing Vine Stuff!

Climbing Vine Stuff! Climbing Vine Stuff! Climbing Vine Stuff!
  • Home
  • Website
  • About
  • TLO News Sept. 2026.
  • TLO News Oct. 2026
  • Preview Nov. 2026 News
  • Contact
  • News Essays, Commentary.
  • Book Reviews.
  • Logout

Preview November 2026 News.

Trump's Continuing Violations of US Federal Laws.

A Summary of Illegal Campaign and PAC Monies for Use by US President.

(AI was used for this article.)


Core Legal Restrictions


  • Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA): PAC funds and Super PAC funds must be used strictly for federal election, campaign, or independent political purposes, not for official government operations, personal use, or executive branch administration. 


  • The Antideficiency Act and Augmentation Prohibition: Federal agencies and the president cannot spend funds outside of congressional appropriations or augment appropriated funds with unapproved private or external money. Projects like building or altering official White House structures require explicit congressional authorization and appropriations. 


  • Officeholder Solicitations: Under the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) and FEC regulations, federal office holders (including the President) are restricted from soliciting, receiving, or directing funds in connection with federal elections or external entities that do not comply with strict federal contribution limits and source bans. Using a PAC to finance official duties blurs the legal line into improper coercion, illegal augmentation, or "pay-to-play" corruption. 


  • Public vs. Political Resources: Official White House resources, staff time, and facilities cannot be commingled with campaign or PAC finances. Conversely, PAC monies cannot subsidize official government functions, executive residence upkeep, or state events. 



The Iran War. Violations of US and International Laws.(Courtesy Google AI) (Edited by TLO).

This article was composed by AI using AI sources.


President Donald Trump’s military campaign against Iran (beginning February 28, 2026, with Operation Epic Fury) has been widely challenged by legal scholars, the American Civil Liberties Union, the Brennan Center for Justice, and members of Congress for violating multiple domestic and international laws: U.S. Constitutional Violations

  • Article I War Powers: The U.S. Constitution grants exclusive authority to declare war and authorize offensive military force to Congress, not the President. Critics state that launching large-scale strikes and a regime-change operation without prior congressional authorization violates Article I. 
  • Bypassing the War Powers Resolution of 1973: Under the War Powers Resolution, a president must terminate unauthorized military hostilities within 60 days (with a 30-day extension) unless Congress declares war, authorizes the action, or extends the deadline. Legal analysts and lawmakers (such as Rep. John Larson) argue that continuing military operations past the 60-day mark without approval or attempting to reset the clock via legal maneuvers breaches the statute. 

International Law Violations

  • U.N. Charter Article 2(4): Legal experts state the offensive breaches the foundational post-war legal order by using force against another state's territorial integrity and political independence. 
  • Lack of Self-Defense Justification: Under international law, unilateral military action is lawful only under UN Security Council authorization or genuine self-defense against an actual or imminent armed attack. Critics and legal analyses note there was no verifiable imminent attack by Iran justifying the strikes, raising accusations of an illegal act of aggression. 
  • Assassination Directives: Legal reviews pointed out that targeting and killing high-level Iranian leadership, including Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, violated longstanding executive orders banning political assassinations. 

Congressional Pushback and Actions

  • War Powers & Funding Cutoffs: Lawmakers have introduced resolutions and legislation (such as efforts by Rep. John Larson and Rep. Gregory Meeks) to compel a House lawsuit, enforce the War Powers Resolution, and utilize Congress's power of the purse to block further federal funding for the unauthorized conflict. 



Washington DC Issues and Local Violations of US Federal Laws.


Trump Cuts Down Hundreds of Trees for DC Golf Course Without Legal Authorization Before US Federal Judge Blocks Him. 

AP News. October, 2026.



Under continuing edit.

Dangerous Moves by Pete Hegseth Involving US Military Funding.

TLO Op-ed.

(Photo credit: The Capitol Net. Congressional Authorizations et.al. A study textbook for college and university students majoring in US Political Science). 


As all US college and university students have learned at one point or another, that funding for ANYTHING that goes on at the Federal level of US government ALWAYS involves US Congressional budget decision-making and Congressional legislation, and that includes US military funding. Funding for the US military is, in truth and in fact, so complicated, that it isn't easy to assess these days even the least of ongoing directions of US military investments and defense posturing. If the US War Department is nowadays classifying so many different types of what was once publicly available information about the US military as private only, then what was once considered a civilian-led US military is at present a US military-executive led military that doesn't necessarily have to answer to the American public for anything that it is doing or plans to do involving national defense or warfare! And that is a terrifying new development in US national and international defense policy! 


The reports of multiple high-level firings of US Generals, Admirals and Pentagon staff by Hegseth -Trump are not only disconcerting for US political observers, but also suspect are the "reasons for the firings"! They include often spurious or even ridiculous DEI or WOKE accusations against the military personnel involved, but more distressingly, additional Hegseth -Trump accusations that the US military leaders chosen by this Administration for firings were "not aligned with the current Administration's intentions and directions for today's US Armed Forces". These firing actions, objectively and historically speaking, have never been previously used in the US as an excuse for firing so many US military leaders! By firing them, Hegseth -Trump may already have significantly deteriorated and degraded US national security, as well as completely eliminated the internal Pentagon leadership possibilities of arguing against and correcting bad executive decisions, various national or coordinated international military intelligence reports, and/or correcting and arguing against serious mistakes made in command authority decisions affecting US military service people serving all around the world and in space!


Under edit.

False and Real Emergency Possibilities Before and After US Midterms.

False and Real Emergency Possibilities Before and After US Midterms.

(Photo: Francisco Marin. Valparaiso, Chile. Riot troops standing on streets of city. 2019-2026.

(Photo: Francisco Marin.) Valparaiso, Chile. Riot troops standing on streets of city. 2019-2026.


TLO Analysis.


Well, we were warned. If it wasn't for our "being WOKE" a lot of the time, and especially during the course of this second Trump Presidency, let's face it: We would still be writing non-political news about popular book releases and "cat video" trends! But fortunately for readers interested in where they stand in their own US national government choices, TLO has a monthly news and editorial list of current news events happening not only all over the USA but also from many different places around the planet where news is news, and not just a compilation of advertising bits designed to influence your personal shopping choices! Having said that, here is a compiled list we here at TLO have made about the several possible "chess moves" that the Trump Administration could make before or after the US Midterm elections in order to control a potentially and strongly, socially divisive result that changes US Congressional dynamics from a Republican trifecta to a Democrat-led US House, US Senate, or both! Remember the January 6 Capitol Riots? Any similar events coming as a result of these Midterm elections no matter what happens along the way could make those events seem like a walk in the park compared to what may be coming for the United States nationally before, during and after Election Day!


As millions of US Americans TODAY know, Trump publicly spoke in front of a MAGA rally and defended his actions in the "US's" (AKA "Trump's") war against Iran, stating that to "let them (Iran) take out Los Angeles or San Diego..." would be a small price to pay for winning this war (against Iran)! And the mesmerized crowds cheered him on! That was not an American rally! That sounded more like Mussolini or Hitler foaming at the mouth while describing the pain and suffering they would inflict upon their own countrymen if they dissented against their national participations in WWII! And despite Trump's "correction statement" made at another rally following the despicable incident previously, it still leaves a bitter taste in the mouth of MAGA critics and everyday Americans from California that Trump seemed at first willing to sacrifice US cities with high concentrations of US military stations, and US military personnel, and US civilians before being condemned all throughout news and social media for saying what he said.


Additionally, Trump has made glaringly false statements at other GOP rallies for US Republican midterm candidates, including falsely naming companies that are planning future investments in the USA, and also excusing himself for consistently making untimely comments about the "beautiful women" he works with or appoints to Federal offices. During one rally he even strangely spoke of WNBA player Sophie Cunningham's "beauty" and stated that "Sophie is a beautiful young woman. You probably wouldn’t mind her on the team, not to help you with points, but to help you with attendance. The attendance would be great." Whatever. 


Trump has displayed a condemnable habit of seeming to introduce the new possibility of future US politicians to encourage favoritism based upon female appearance for Federal and Executive jobs and even encouraging potential sexual harassment in US government by making statements such as these constantly. He has now expanded these encouragements and statements into the field of women's sports! Is this part of an overall Trump plan to describe future Democrats as too "unattractive" to hold public office? That thought wouldn't surprise any of us here at TLO considering that many of Trump's mainly female picks for executive Federal positions are previous beauty contest contestants or those who portray a glamorous lifestyle! And no matter what their job qualifications are. Exceptions to this general "Trump-style" Federal hiring and nomination and job appointment pattern are hard to find, honestly. And when it comes to convincing innocent people to do something that goes against against their own sober conscience, there is an old French saying: "..Cherchez la femme..."


Most recently, Trump has issued a 48 hour warning to California government to separate out ballots of alleged non-citizen voters or face a lawsuit. This action begs the question of how a non-citizen can register to vote in the first place and further delays efforts at accurately counting already submitted votes in California by mail. It's obvious that despite already existing and submitted evidence that non-citizens haven't previously registered or voted in California elections, that somehow- because "Trump says so"- they now do, and California is expected to back Trump on this fallible assumption! Whatever! Now California can possibly expect a delayed outcome when it comes to tallying 2026 midterm votes. But.....so what? No matter how long it takes, California has an effective and excellent track record for accurate and secure voting regardless of anything, including anarchy, cheating and chaos that the Trump party can conjure up to interfere with California elections! And ANOTHER question is WHY Trump singled out California for this particular type of lawsuit? And it could be for the same reasons that Trump denied funding for blue states and provided funding for red states in 2025 before a Us Federal Judge intervened to force Trump to release ALL designated funding or face punitive actions! Trump using partisan executive decisions to break US laws and attack US Democrats! 


And in yet another alarming incident, and right before the midterm elections, US Congressional Democrat House Representative from Minnesota Ilhan Omar's house in Washington DC was raided by FBI agents pursuing evidence of immigration law crimes that were possibly to be located at her house. US Rep. Omar has been living in the US for 31 years, after emigrating from a Kenyan refugee camp after fleeing Somalia. Trump has repeatedly attacked Omar and her legal presence in the US as he believes she is illegal and should be deported for immigration fraud, which the FBI has previously done, and DHS has been investigating, again, without either agency finding any proof! 


At the time of this writing, Trump has threatened California voter and registration workers with possible fines and/or imprisonment for not eliminating non-citizens from voter rolls, a law that already exists in California and under which no non-citizens are allowed to register and vote in Federal elections! Trump is pulling out all of the fear-mongering stops he can in order to interfere with normal elections processes by constantly brining up the fetid and stale subject of illegal voting which wasn't even proven after numerous attempts at doing so since 2016-2020 when Trump first started accusing the US elections as "being rigged" without introducing ANY PROOF leading to his accusations! Like the Reflection Pool debacle of his, Trump's delusional nature and hunches are not only getting people killed and falsely charged with crimes they haven't committed, but are delaying the US elections processes even more than they are usually delayed because of the sheer number of US citizens voting per election year per US State and US Territory! 


Normally, or at least under normal circumstances during an election year, both houses of US Congress are usually at work and in session. This practice protects the US national defense and security from unexpected surprises that could affect the country during elections season and would require potentially rapid emergency and/or important and immediate US Congressional decisions -and also the ongoing and continuous Congressional decision -making maintenance needed for conducting and insuring timely US voting operations -because the Congress is necessary to certify the final elections tally and declare the winners of important US elections including, and up to, the President of the United States. BUT, House Speaker Johnson recessed the House from October until November AFTER the elections, which from this voter perspective makes NO ACTUAL SENSE! To add insult to injury, Trump in July, 2026 fired the whole US Election Assistance Commission  and has not appointed any new commission members, which will strongly and negatively affect the elections processes in November during the Midterms! 


Under continued edit.

Should ICE Agency Be Made Subject to Voter Approval?

ICE Agency Origins, Public Response, Recent News Developments.

Photo courtesy ICE.gov. 2026.

TLO Op-ed.


Depending upon which opinion you happen to be of, ICE is either a US Federal agency that is helping to secure the US borders and immigration system from illegal immigration and immigration fraud within the United States, or an archaic Federal system of private political and partisan interests, abusive arrests and detentions of people who have committed no crimes-including children-and who have followed President Trump into a melee of humanitarian abuses and unnecessary death and injury as a result of ICE-involved customs and border enforcement tactics that seem so often to defy US Constitutional laws protecting anyone and everyone currently residing for any reason whatsoever within the geographic boundaries of the United States. The differences can become confusing when confronted with the US laws pertaining to definitions of hard crime, trans-national criminal organizations and illegal immigration vs. asylum seekers, migrant workers and people who overstay their work or study visas. And the differences between those groups of people are what make this current set of issues so important to US Americans and people from both sides of the fence that divides individuals between respecting the work of a Federal agency or determining whether or not that agency is following its own existing rules for engagement with the public as well as targeted groups of, and also individuals accused of crimes warranting apprehension and detention!


Despite so many changes and adaptations to the agency's work agenda between 2025-26, and most recently Trump's demands for ICE to "go after anybody!", holistically speaking, Trump's "executive leadership" and oft-times contradictory work and statements from DHS Secretary Mullin concerning ICE seem to make the current status of the ICE agency to be potentially both Federally justifiable but also periodically lawbreakers who are blindly following Trump -or not, as that situation may be- and although mainly remaining a legitimate agency involving immigration and customs enforcement -based their agency name defines them- are sometimes reportedly disregarding known and trained tactics and techniques for arresting people who are wanted by ICE officially, and not always differentiating between those who are arrested and held and detained without having committed crimes that would warrant such treatment. That matter has become so intense a subject of discussion and debate involving people from US State to US State that the question of whether or not ICE should be abolished has been raised again and again by US voters! Congressional Representatives and even US Senators have been paying serious attention to the many, many complaints and lawsuits against the Trump Administration from so many individual incidents where bystanders and protesters and ICE targets have been seriously injured or killed by ICE agents during the course of their daily work!


Officially, ICE maintains a government website that provides the public with much appreciated information about ICE, their work and the origins of that agency, which is quite informative and helpful. However, what bothers many US Americans who constantly protest ICE actions is the legal and operational range that ICE is given for arrests and detentions, as well as Trump's "ICE mandates" which are publicly perceived to be an overly aggressive, violent and probably illegal policy of acceptable physical assaults against unarmed civilians who are living in the United States including unarmed ICE targets and unarmed innocent bystanders-and then the ability to arrest them, sometimes without appropriate warrants, and often separating children from their parents or arresting even children within their "immigration sweeps". The sheer amount of formal complaints against armed ICE agents involve those of ICE agents lying on reports submitted to DHS about incidents involving shootings and injuries against protesters. Contradictory body cam evidence as to how and why a person was injured or killed by an ICE agent or agents, as well as the vetting process and training procedures of ICE agents are part of the complaints being forwarded to DHS. In light of new whistleblower testimony by a former ICE supervisor and trainer of ICE field agents defining how agents were being trained not to pay attention to a target's Constitutional rights during arrests and other lawbreaking operations techniques to the main Congressional oversight committee overseeing ICE activities, new investigations from DHS and Congress are taking place involving ICE practices in the field. ICE agents are expected by the US public to adhere to the same laws that all law enforcement officer/agent operations within the US and overseas practice and that are applicable throughout every Federal and US State law enforcement agency in the country. The following are web articles that can be referenced for updated news from October regarding ICE and DHS activity that are being questioned by Congress and SCOTUS. The news is disturbing, so you are warned about jumping to immediate conclusions about the overall perspectives and situations involving everything and everyone involved in the reports:


FEMA Accused of Violating Court Orders.

FEMA violating court order on $1B in public safety grants, states’ lawsuit says.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/fema-violating-court-order-1b-152225995.html


DHS Agency Raids Ilhan Omar's Home.

What the DHS raid on Ilhan Omar’s home is really about
https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/dhs-raid-ilhan-omar-home-100000201.html


DHS Proposing Ending Deference for Prior USCIS Approvals for Non-Immigrant Workers.

https://eiglaw.com/dhs-proposes-ending-deference-for-prior-uscis-approvals-in-nonimmigrant-worker-extension-cases/


DHS Sued for Restricting Training Options for International Students Seeking Credits for Enrollment in DHS Training Programs.

https://www.highereddive.com/news/dhs-sued-over-guidance-restricting-training-program-for-international-stude/832314/


ICE Agency Sued for Withholding Return of Passports, Work Permits.

https://www.newsnationnow.com/us-news/immigration/ice-sued-7-immigrants-withheld-passports-work-permits/amp/


DHS Threatens Immigration Attorneys.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/dhs-top-lawyer-threatens-penalties-attorneys-clogging-asylum-system.amp


US Federal Judge Restores US Federal Protections for Permanent Resident Aliens With Pending Approvals for Citizenship and/or Asylum Applicants Seeking Approval for Stays.

https://www.newsweek.com/dhs-policy-that-made-it-harder-for-immigrants-to-get-visas-blocked-by-judge-12545028


Washington State Attorney Sues Trump Administration for Using Fear and Intimidation Tactics to Force Immigrants to Deny Themselves from Receiving Legally Approved Benefits.

https://www.atg.wa.gov/news/news-releases/ag-brown-sues-block-new-public-charge-rule-us-department-homeland-security


Texas DA States that ICE Agent Intentionally Hit Fleeing Man.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/texas-da-says-ice-intentionally-hit-immigrant-car-may-withheld-evidenc-rcna603243


Trump DHS Funding Policies Questioned. 

https://theconversation.com/how-trumps-disaster-aid-delays-and-fema-cuts-could-galvanize-the-movable-middle-in-the-2026-elections-294236


In Cruel Action, DHS Cuts Appeal Time for Refugee Applicants to Contest Termination of Status from 30 Days to 10 Days.

https://www.globalrefuge.org/news/dhs-rule-10-day-notice-period/


Under continuing edit.


Copyright © 2026 Climbing Vine Stuff!  - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept